History vs Myth in the Western

Cover for The Devil in the Bottle

The Devil in the Bottle

Willy was a cowboy. His mother, Lou, homesteaded two half sections. His older brother, Steve, worked in a gold stamp mill, where their stepfather was foreman. His uncle Tom drove cattle up from Texas, established a ranch, and married Willy’s aunt Kitty, who had divorced her first husband for gambling.

One bright July morning in 1901, Lou cooked breakfast for a stranger riding by. Not liking him much, Willy took his .22 rifle off the wall. He showed the stranger what a good gun it was and bragged that he could shoot the eye out of a jackrabbit at a hundred yards. Both he and Lou breathed easier when the stranger left. A few weeks later they learned they had entertained the Sundance Kid, Harry Longabaugh.

Willy, who grew up to be called Bill, was my father. Those two paragraphs combine the Western myth and Western history. The cowboy, the homesteader, the rancher, the outlaw, the lady — were the stuff of myth. They were also real people. Industrial workers like Steve in the stamp mill were real, too, though they didn’t capture anyone’s imagination like the cowboy and gunslinger myth.

Perhaps that’s because Steve worked in a confined space, while Bill and Sundance worked outside, under the limitless sky, free to move around.

Through Bill’s stories, Sundance became part of my own history. For me, Western history and Western myth meld into flesh and blood, and Western history becomes far more than an academic exercise. It is the story of people, my own ancestors, both men and women.

Writing about Jack Slade in my novel, The Devil in the Bottle, I became fascinated with him. The man was a mass of contradictions. He is at once historical and mythical. He was a gunslinger who became the subject of myth, a tragic figure whose flaw, alcoholism, destroyed his many gifts. The man who might have been an architect of the West became an uncontrollable drunk, whose contemporaries referred to him as a “demon.”

In the Western myth the cowboy and the outlaw are types. People, on the other hand, are incredibly complex even when they’re not Jack Slade. Their inherent contradictions – good and evil, strengths and weaknesses – reside in the same person. The real cowboy historically did and does a necessary, difficult, dirty job for 30 a month and found (board and room). Bill talked about herding cattle in a rainstorm, water seeping down the insides of his boots and puddling in his saddle, his hands numb, to drive animals away from a rising river. He dismounted to carry sheep out of buffalo wallows so they would not drown, and decades later his frustration with animals so stupid would surface in his face and his voice.

People who do that sort of work are heroic, and have no need of a gun to enhance their heroism.

But along with that heroism come the ordinary flaws of being human. Tempers rise, and frustration erupts against other people and animals.

Somehow, from this mix of heroism and anger and cruelty as well as kindness and love, people made a country.

Between history and myth, it seems to me, there is a space, and from that space my stories come. History melds with myth in the story of Slade, in the stories of people doing the best they can to survive in difficult situations.

Post to Twitter

Posted in cowboy, genre fiction, Westerns | Tagged , , , | 4 Comments

How Indie Bookstores Can Survive

I love Amazon. Really. I started shopping there in 1995, when they first went online, during the years when daily rumor said they were losing so much money they’d go under in a month. A month. Sixteen years ago.

I’ve published all three of my Western historical novels through CreateSpace, the Amazon subsidiary, and will continue to publish with them and on the Kindle platform. In my own small way, I harness Amazon’s long tail marketing for my niche. (More about that on my continuing self-publishing blog, The Entrepreneurial Author.)

Nevertheless, nothing beats our local indie bookstores for the “book” experience. To a degree, that’s because we’re in Montana.

Granted, Montana is different. We’re the fourth largest state, and we have fewer than a million residents. Job prospects are dismal in many areas, and for nearly everyone money is tight. Very tight.

Someone has said that Montana is a small town with very long streets. How true. During the upcoming political year, we’ll get to know our candidates. Unlike in other places, though, if I don’t know someone, I know someone who does. Six degrees of separation don’t work here; it’s more like three degrees.

What does that mean for bookstores? For Amazon? It means community. Or not community.

When we lost Borders, we lost a community center for book lovers, for people who needed a hideout on Sunday afternoons away from the clamor of their everyday lives with no pressure to buy anything. The indie bookstores are filling the gap as best they can.

Amazon can’t do that. You and I can buy cheap on Amazon, but we can’t bump into our friends and acquaintances. It might save us money, but it can’t pour the coffee or provide a refuge on snowy afternoons.

From my observation, if indie bookstores consider themselves little community centers, they might do better. A couple of comfy chairs, a coffee pot with fresh coffee. But if all they do is sell books and make it plain that customers should buy books and that’s all, guess what?

The uge to save money will kick in and people will shop at Amazon.

Post to Twitter

Posted in Montana's Vigilantes | 4 Comments

The Hardest Book I’ve Written Yet

Slade's Devil

Slade's Devil

The Devil in the Bottle is done. It’s live on Amazon as of today, and it’s available on Kindle.

It’s the hardest book I’ve ever written. It may be the most difficult book I’ll ever write, because this one comes from places within myself I don’t like to revisit. There my experience with alcoholics lives. Still, now that the book is out, to live its own independent life, I feel I can put down a burden.

The book’s title really says it all. For alcoholics, recovering or not, a devil lives in each bottle. A song* by Hank Williams, Jr., really sums it up: “…he wants me to die.” So true. The devil in the bottle is a killer. It murders the alcoholic and injures his or her family and friends, as well as total strangers who might happen into the wrong place at the wrong time.

Quoting Josiah Dimsdale, the first historian of the Vigilantes, Mark Twain said that Joseph (aka Jack) Slade “was more feared than the Almighty.” Twain met Slade in 1861.* He’d heard the stories about Slade’s murderous behavior and trembled in his boots when he met him. Slade, being sober, behaved like the decent gentleman he was — except when drunk.

My portrayal of Slade on a drunken spree is historically accurate. His friends inside and outside the Vigilance Committee warned him many times to go home, to ride over the ridge, to get on his horse and go. Several times he yielded, but each time he had to stop for one more drink until he stood on a makeshift gallows.

This novel is a tragedy, and Slade was a tragic figure. He could have been an architect of the West. He was a man of great abilities, all wasted, sacrificed to the Devil in the Bottle. It’s a tragedy for the people who loved him, as alcoholism so often is. I don’t believe his friends escaped unwounded from those three days in March 1864. Reading John X Beidler’s account, or Judge Alex Davis’s, if your heart doesn’t crack a bit, I don’t know why not.

His wife, strong and courageous though she was, does not appear ever to have recovered.

I thought it was fitting to dedicate the book to Alcoholics Anonymous, and by extension to Al-Anon:

In memory of Bill W., and to all his friends

*I came across the song while I was doing a title search after I came up with the title, The Devil in the Bottle.
*Twain (then young Samuel Clemens) describes the encounter years afterward in Roughing It.

Post to Twitter

Posted in Al-Anon, Alcoholics Anonymous, Montana's Vigilantes, The Devil in the Bottle | Tagged , , , | 4 Comments

The Devil in the Bottle

Cover for The Devil in the Bottle

The Devil in the Bottle

When an author displays the cover of a book, you can bet it’s getting close! That’s definitely true of The Devil in the Bottle, my third novel featuring attorney Dan Stark, the Montana Vigilante prosecutor.

In March 1864, Joseph (aka Jack) Slade erupted into Alder Gulch on yet another destructive binge, and before long had pushed the Vigilantes into the worst dilemma Dan had ever faced. Who would rule Alder Gulch? Slade or the Vigilantes? Without a jail, they have only one means of stopping him — but Slade has committed no capital crime. Yet how else can they protect the honest people of the Gulch from Slade and the certain rise in crime if they abdicate?

Today I uploaded the completed interior file to CreateSpace. I’m waiting now for the cover file to come from the designer. Then …

It won’t be long now! Thank you all for your encouragement and your patience.

Post to Twitter

Posted in Law & Vigilance, literary Western, Montana's Vigilantes, The Devil in the Bottle | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Historical Accuracy and Modern Politics

Yesterday on my Facebook author page, I passed on a report from The Washington Post that Bill O’Reilly’s book, Killing Lincoln, will not be sold in Ford’s Theater Book Shop because of its historical inaccuracies.

Last night Mr. O’Reilly vigorously defended his book and displayed a statement from the Ford’s Theater Society that indeed the book is for sale there. The website Mediaite reports today that Ford’s Theater does carry the book in the theater gift store operated in the lobby by the Ford’s Theater Society.

The Ford Theater bookstore which the National Park Service operates in the basement will not carry the book because a NPS historian issued a negative review, citing poor documentation and historical inaccuracies. Other historians, the Post says, have criticized the book for inaccuracies and its lack of footnotes, although it has an afterword that lists the sources the authors consulted.

This controversy, whether or not O’Reilly’s book is historically inaccurate, or whether it is being attacked by the author’s political opponents, does give us lessons to learn, I think.

First, I should not have been so quick to repeat something from a source like The Washington Post, where I first read the story, and which indeed opposes Mr. O’Reilly’s politics. The story, as best I could verify it on the ‘Net, appears to be factual, however, and it does say that the Ford’s Theater lobby gift shop carries the book. Lesson learned: Check facts always, especially when I read it on the Internet.

I inaccurately reported that Ford’s Theater would not sell the book in its bookstore, when in fact there are two bookstores, one of which carries it and the other does not.

Second, Mr. O’Reilly’s responded last evening that the controversy was politically motivated “guttersniping.” His response reminds me of a self-published author who caused a storm on the Internet when she attacked a reviewer who gave her book a bad review. Lesson learned from both of these examples: We writers should be careful how we respond to negative reviews.

We can look at this problem of accuracy on a continuum. Some books about the past should be held to rigorous standards of documentation. Among these I’d include treatises, or history books, which should have footnotes justifying nearly every statement. Other books about historical events are not history books, but journalistic treatments of history, and I wouldn’t hold these to the same rigorous standard. Third might be creative nonfiction books, with little or no citations but with a bibliography perhaps. An author of creative nonfiction is more free to use his or her imagination to explain historical figures’ motivations, and readers understand these books may or may not be historically accurate. Finally, on the continuum, I’d place my own books — historical fiction. I research my novels exhaustively, but for strictly historical accuracy I recommend history books.

The problem arises, it seems to me, when authors claim exact historical accuracy but deliver facts cherry-picked to support their political thesis. But that’s a subject for the next blog.

Meanwhile, what are your thoughts about this controversy? Did the Internet media play fair? Should Mr. O’Reilly responded as he did?

Post to Twitter

Posted in Civil War, historical accuracy | Tagged , , | 4 Comments